The Library
1530 papers on microsampling and monitoring, each with a finding paraphrased to our standard and labelled in one vocabulary. Every entry links to a legitimate copy; nothing is copied from an abstract.
2 papers labelled “fit”, newest first.
2018
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to raise colorectal cancer screening participation, including mailed outreach of home collection kits.
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Dougherty et al., JAMA Internal Medicine (paywalled)
- acceptability
- self-collection
- colorectal
- stool
- fit
2014
Pooling 19 studies, FIT for colorectal cancer showed ~0.79 sensitivity and ~0.94 specificity: a moderately sensitive, highly specific single-sample stool screen, dependent on the positivity cut-off.
Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Lee et al., Annals of Internal Medicine
- stool
- colorectal
- fit
- validation
Read from the corpus on .