Skip to content
OpenSampling

2023 · Diagnostics · open access

Painless Capillary Blood Collection: A Rapid Evaluation of the Onflow Device

Noble et al.

The finding, in our words

In healthy adults, capillary blood collected with the Onflow device yielded similar chemistry results to venous blood and was rated more acceptable with lower pain than venepuncture, with high willingness to reuse and positive phlebotomist usability.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2026

    Capillary blood collected with Tasso+ devices demonstrated strong agreement with venous blood for primary Athlete Biological Passport markers (haemoglobin, reticulocytes, OFF-score, ABPS) with correlations ≥0.9, though platelet count showed poor concordance. Despite 44 of 209 samples failing pre-analytical checks mainly due to coagulation, high athlete acceptance and minimal pain support capillary sampling as a less invasive, viable alternative for decentralised anti-doping controls.

    Capillary Blood as a Potential New Matrix for the Athlete Biological Passport: A Field-Based Comparison StudyRequena-Tutusaus et al., Medicine and science in sports and exercise (paywalled) · source ↗

    • blood
    • liquid
    • capillary
    • validation
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • doping
  2. 2026

    In a cohort of 62 participants evaluating home self-collection with the TassoPlus device, 38 returned samples, with 29% excluded due to insufficient plasma volume below 200 ΔL. Although viral load measurements in adequate samples correlated well with conventional testing (r = 0.800), the high failure rate and missed detection in low-volume viremic samples indicate that further technical refinements are necessary before clinical adoption.

    Feasibility and reliability of decentralized HIV-1 viral load monitoring on self-sampled bloodMendes de Leon et al., PloS one · source ↗

    • blood
    • liquid
    • capillary
    • self-collection
    • validation
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • serology
  3. 2025

    A head-to-head of four upper-arm capillary devices, including TAP Micro Select, versus fingerstick and venous: experience and performance varied by device with none clearly superior, while analyte correlations with venous were similar across all.

    Comparing capillary blood collection technologies: patient experience, device performance and clinical accuracyCollier et al., Bioanalysis (paywalled) · source ↗

    • blood
    • liquid
    • yourbio
    • capillary
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • validation
    • bd-microtainer
  4. 2025

    A vacuum-assisted upper-arm device collected a mean 538 µL and met the volume target in 85.5% of cases; 17 of 19 analytes met CLIA agreement with venous, with pain lower than fingerstick.

    Evaluation of a Simplified Upper-Arm Device for Vacuum-Assisted Collection of Capillary BloodSchaff et al., Diagnostics · source ↗

    • blood
    • liquid
    • capillary
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • validation
    • bd-microtainer
  5. 2025

    This meta-analysis found strong agreement between self-collected capillary blood and venous samples for laboratory results. Capillary sampling was associated with significantly lower pain scores than venipuncture, particularly when using upper arm devices rather than fingerprick methods.

    Comparison of laboratory results and pain perception in self-sampled capillary blood versus venous blood sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysisSchröder et al., Clinical biochemistry (paywalled) · source ↗

    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • blood
    • self-collection
    • capillary
    • liquid
    • validation