Skip to content
OpenSampling

2022 · PloS one · open access

SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing of pooled saliva samples: A case study of 824 asymptomatic individuals and a questionnaire survey in Japan

Oba et al.

The finding, in our words

Pooled RT-qPCR of self-collected saliva from 824 asymptomatic employees identified two SARS-CoV-2 positives; one positive was detectable only by an amplification trend without a Ct value. A survey of 471 participants revealed that most would accept regular screening only if free or low-cost, supporting pooled saliva testing as a rapid, efficient, and inexpensive method for frequent large-scale decentralised screening.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2024

    Diagnostic performance, stability, and acceptability of self-collected saliva without additives for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis

    Self-collected saliva without additives showed comparable diagnostic performance to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection, with 87.6% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. The sample remained stable for 72 hours and was deemed acceptable by both patients and staff, supporting its use in decentralised, patient-centric screening programmes.

    Marín-Echeverri et al., European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  2. 2022

    RT-qPCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection in pooled saliva samples for massive population screening to monitor epidemics

    A two‑tier decentralised testing strategy using self‑collected saliva pools detected SARS‑CoV‑2 with higher sensitivity than a commercial IVD RT‑qPCR test and enabled identification of asymptomatic cases at lower cost.

    Różański et al., Scientific reports · source ↗

    • economics
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  3. 2022

    Saliva as an alternative specimen to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis: Review

    Saliva shows promise as a patient-friendly alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis, particularly for decentralised testing, though variability in collection and processing methods affects sensitivity. Standardising protocols could improve reliability and support wider use in decentralised diagnostics.

    McPhillips & MacSharry, Access microbiology · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  4. 2022

    Self-collection of capillary blood and saliva to determine COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and health professionals

    Capillary blood self-sampling achieved 98.3% agreement with venous samples for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and 100% for IgA among 60 participants, demonstrating accuracy for vaccine monitoring. Saliva self-collection proved feasible with excellent usability, offering a patient-centric alternative for decentralised immunogenicity assessment.

    Schmetzer et al., Frontiers in public health · source ↗

    • blood
    • saliva
    • liquid
    • capillary
    • self-collection
    • validation
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • serology
  5. 2022

    Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics

    Generic saliva self-collection devices enabled safe unsupervised home sampling that yielded adequate quantity and quality for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene detection, with stability maintained after temperature cycling to simulate summer and winter shipping. This supports a patient-centric decentralised approach to infectious-disease screening without requiring healthcare professionals.

    Allicock et al., BMC infectious diseases · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva