Skip to content
OpenSampling

2022 · PloS one · open access

SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing of pooled saliva samples: A case study of 824 asymptomatic individuals and a questionnaire survey in Japan

Oba et al.

The finding, in our words

Pooled RT-qPCR of self-collected saliva from 824 asymptomatic employees identified two SARS-CoV-2 positives; one positive was detectable only by an amplification trend without a Ct value. A survey of 471 participants revealed that most would accept regular screening only if free or low-cost, supporting pooled saliva testing as a rapid, efficient, and inexpensive method for frequent large-scale decentralised screening.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2024

    Self-collected saliva without additives showed comparable diagnostic performance to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection, with 87.6% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. The sample remained stable for 72 hours and was deemed acceptable by both patients and staff, supporting its use in decentralised, patient-centric screening programmes.

    Diagnostic performance, stability, and acceptability of self-collected saliva without additives for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosisMarín-Echeverri et al., European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  2. 2022

    A two‑tier decentralised testing strategy using self‑collected saliva pools detected SARS‑CoV‑2 with higher sensitivity than a commercial IVD RT‑qPCR test and enabled identification of asymptomatic cases at lower cost.

    RT-qPCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection in pooled saliva samples for massive population screening to monitor epidemicsRóżański et al., Scientific reports · source ↗

    • economics
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  3. 2022

    Saliva shows promise as a patient-friendly alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis, particularly for decentralised testing, though variability in collection and processing methods affects sensitivity. Standardising protocols could improve reliability and support wider use in decentralised diagnostics.

    Saliva as an alternative specimen to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis: ReviewMcPhillips & MacSharry, Access microbiology · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  4. 2022

    Capillary blood self-sampling achieved 98.3% agreement with venous samples for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and 100% for IgA among 60 participants, demonstrating accuracy for vaccine monitoring. Saliva self-collection proved feasible with excellent usability, offering a patient-centric alternative for decentralised immunogenicity assessment.

    Self-collection of capillary blood and saliva to determine COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and health professionalsSchmetzer et al., Frontiers in public health · source ↗

    • blood
    • saliva
    • liquid
    • capillary
    • self-collection
    • validation
    • venous-agreement
    • acceptability
    • serology
  5. 2022

    Generic saliva self-collection devices enabled safe unsupervised home sampling that yielded adequate quantity and quality for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene detection, with stability maintained after temperature cycling to simulate summer and winter shipping. This supports a patient-centric decentralised approach to infectious-disease screening without requiring healthcare professionals.

    Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosticsAllicock et al., BMC infectious diseases · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva