2025 · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · paywalled
Accuracy analysis of cervical cancer screening using urine and vaginal self-sampling versus clinician-collected samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Li et al.
The finding, in our words
A meta-analysis of 15 studies with 3665 participants showed that urine and vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing achieved pooled sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.81 for cervical cancer screening, with an area under the curve of 0.92. Vaginal self-sampling outperformed urine sampling for high-risk HPV detection, and both methods demonstrated high sensitivity for identifying CIN2 lesions, indicating their suitability for patient-centric screening.
A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.