Skip to content
OpenSampling

2022 · Oral diseases · paywalled

Salivary diagnostics of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

Michailidou et al.

The finding, in our words

The review found saliva to be a non‑invasive, well‑tolerated specimen for SARS‑CoV‑2 detection that enables home self‑sampling, thereby protecting healthcare workers from exposure. It concluded that salivary diagnostics could offer a rapid, cost‑effective approach for early COVID‑19 screening, but further research is needed to establish reliability.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2026

    Validation of Dried Saliva for Molecular Diagnostics

    The study found that self-collected dried saliva on FishburneTabs achieved 92% accuracy for viral RNA detection compared to standard liquid saliva samples. This method supports decentralised testing by enabling reliable sample storage and transport for upper respiratory infections.

    Mora et al., ACS measurement science au · source ↗

    • self-collection
    • dried
    • serology
    • validation
    • saliva
  2. 2026

    Beyond the laboratory: how COVID-19 reshaped specimen collection, testing workflows, and diagnostic algorithms

    The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of decentralised testing and self-collected saliva specimens, but revealed challenges with variable diagnostic accuracy and lack of internationally standardised processing protocols. Stricter regulatory oversight and robust diagnostic stewardship are needed to balance broad access with clinical performance.

    Domnich & Pariani, Expert review of molecular diagnostics (paywalled) · source ↗

    • standards
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • validation
    • saliva
  3. 2025

    Integrative Advances in Dengue Virus Diagnostics: From Technological Innovation to Tiered Diagnostic Systems

    This review summarises how incorporating saliva and urine into home-based point-of-care systems expands diagnostic accessibility for dengue virus, aligning with the WHO REASSURED framework for affordable and rapid testing.

    Shi et al., Journal of medical virology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • saliva
    • urine
    • self-collection
    • validation
    • serology
  4. 2025

    Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 screening tests: a national prospective analysis

    Oral sponge saliva RT-PCR achieved 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity compared with nasopharyngeal swabs in 3,488 symptomatic and asymptomatic adults, while buccal swab performance varied with infection history and symptoms. The rapid antigen test showed 66.9% sensitivity overall, increasing to 97% in high viral load samples. Oral sponge collection permits self-sampling without laboratory pre-analytical steps, offering a robust method for decentralised SARS-CoV-2 screening.

    Althaus et al., BMC infectious diseases · source ↗

    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  5. 2025

    Evaluating saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A practical alternative

    Saliva-based RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 achieved 100 per cent sensitivity and 97 per cent specificity against nasopharyngeal swabs, while rapid antigen testing on saliva showed comparable performance and detected 97 per cent of infectious cases with cycle threshold values of 30 or below. This supports saliva self-collection as an accurate, practical option for decentralised COVID-19 screening.

    Sultana et al., Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease (paywalled) · source ↗

    • self-collection
    • serology
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva