Skip to content
OpenSampling

2019 · Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · paywalled

Comparison of Oral Collection Methods for Studies of Microbiota

Vogtmann et al.

The finding, in our words

Oral rinse samples collected in Scope mouthwash remained stable at ambient temperature for four days, with high intraclass correlation for microbial diversity (Shannon index ICC 0.86), supporting their use in decentralised microbiome studies. However, comparability with OMNIgene ORAL samples was low, suggesting collection methods should not be mixed within a study.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2026

    Long-term stability at -80°C of oral wash and saliva samples for microbiome analyses

    Saliva samples collected using the OMNIgene ORAL device and oral wash samples remain stable for microbiome diversity and relative abundance analyses for up to five years when stored at -80°C. This supports the use of these self-collection methods for long-term prospective biobanking and decentralised clinical studies.

    Slack et al., Microbiology spectrum (paywalled) · source ↗

    • stabilised
    • dna-genotek-omnigene
    • self-collection
    • microbiome
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  2. 2023

    Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling to sequencing platforms

    Across 18 saliva samples, mouthwash collection gave higher alpha diversity than passive drooling on both Illumina and Nanopore platforms, and three preservation methods performed alike; mouthwash and simple collection are convenient decentralised options, provided a study keeps one collection method for all participants to avoid confounding.

    Bang et al., Scientific Reports · source ↗

    • stabilised
    • dna-genotek-omnigene
    • microbiome
    • liquid
    • validation
    • saliva
  3. 2025

    Field expedient stool collection methods for gut microbiome analysis in deployed military environments

    This study compared OMNIgene Gut tubes and FTA cards for stool collection in a deployed setting, finding that OMNIgene yielded higher nucleic acid concentrations while both methods detected the majority of microbial genera. The authors conclude that distinct microbial abundance profiles between the two methods necessitate standardised protocols for field research.

    Kok et al., mSphere · source ↗

    • stabilised
    • dna-genotek-omnigene
    • dried
    • microbiome
    • stool
    • validation
  4. 2024

    Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements

    This study compared two preservatives for stool samples and found that OMNIgene GUT OMR-200 produced less variation in metagenomic taxonomic data across different storage temperatures, supporting its use in decentralised field studies. The authors recommend absolute quantification to address bias in microbial measurements.

    Maghini et al., Nature biotechnology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • stabilised
    • dna-genotek-omnigene
    • microbiome
    • stool
    • validation
  5. 2024

    Omnigene-Gut<sup>tm</sup> ensures fecal microbiome stability in the pediatric population

    In children, stool preserved in OMNIgene-GUT kept its microbial community structure better than unpreserved stool, with alpha and beta diversity similar to direct freezing, which supports the kit for decentralised stool collection from children.

    Hoogendijk et al., AMB Express · source ↗

    • dct
    • stabilised
    • dna-genotek-omnigene
    • microbiome
    • pediatric
    • stool
    • validation