Skip to content
OpenSampling

2025 · Statistics in medicine · paywalled

An Information Criterion Approach for Assessing Agreement When Comparing Two Methods of Measurement

Tan et al.

The finding, in our words

This study introduces a statistical approach based on an information criterion to assess agreement between two measurement methods, evaluating six models simultaneously to provide an objective decision rule. The method is demonstrated using real data sets from patient-centric microsampling, offering a robust tool for method validation and regulatory compliance.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2026

    Guidance on capillary-to-plasma conversion: method- and analyte-specific clinical validation with paired capillary–venous samples before reporting plasma-equivalent results.

    To Convert or Not to Convert? Official IATDMCT Guideline on Converting Capillary-Blood Microsampling Concentrations to Plasma ConcentrationsBoffel et al., Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (paywalled) · source ↗

    • venous-agreement
    • blood
    • tdm
    • standards
    • dried
    • capillary
    • validation
  2. 2026

    This UK consensus opinion outlines how clinical laboratories can validate self-collected capillary blood sampling against venous reference standards to achieve accreditation and facilitate the shift towards community-based patient care.

    UK recommendations for the validation and adoption of capillary blood testing within the routine clinical laboratory: Consensus opinion from the LabMed patient-centred testing and sampling (PaCTS) groupWoolley et al., Annals of clinical biochemistry (paywalled) · source ↗

    • venous-agreement
    • blood
    • standards
    • self-collection
    • capillary
    • liquid
    • validation
  3. 2026

    This review establishes that microsampling across blood, saliva, urine and stool matrices offers validated workflows and regulatory recognition for human biomonitoring comparable to conventional methods. It finds that these decentralised approaches enhance participant acceptability and enable screening in remote or low-resource settings.

    Integrating Microsampling in Human Biomonitoring: Methodologies, Regulatory Frameworks, and Case Study InsightsRajamani & Poongavanam, Critical reviews in analytical chemistry (paywalled) · source ↗

    • wearable
    • acceptability
    • multimodal
    • sweat
    • blood
    • dbs
    • standards
    • dried
    • serology
    • colorectal
    • pediatric
    • stool
    • urine
    • validation
    • saliva
    • biomarkers
  4. 2026

    The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of decentralised testing and self-collected saliva specimens, but revealed challenges with variable diagnostic accuracy and lack of internationally standardised processing protocols. Stricter regulatory oversight and robust diagnostic stewardship are needed to balance broad access with clinical performance.

    Beyond the laboratory: how COVID-19 reshaped specimen collection, testing workflows, and diagnostic algorithmsDomnich & Pariani, Expert review of molecular diagnostics (paywalled) · source ↗

    • standards
    • self-collection
    • serology
    • validation
    • saliva
  5. 2025

    The paper highlights that while self-collection microsampling devices for blood and other matrices are advancing decentralised testing, standardisation of sample collection and integration into clinical workflows is critical for reliable results. This matters because it identifies key hurdles that must be overcome for patient-centric sampling to be widely adopted in healthcare.

    Standardization of Microsampling Technologies for Accurate Sensing and Reliable DiagnosticsMora & Mace, ACS sensors (paywalled) · source ↗

    • blood
    • standards
    • self-collection
    • haematocrit
    • validation
    • saliva