2024 · The New Zealand medical journal · paywalled
Process of development of decentralised clinical trial methodology for cancer clinical trials in Aotearoa New Zealand
Lawrence et al.
The finding, in our words
A national steering committee developed twelve standard operating procedures and a supervision plan to guide decentralised cancer clinical trials in New Zealand with an equity focus. This patient-centred approach allows patients to stay in their local areas with their support networks, improving trial accessibility.
A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.
A 2025 review maps 28 microsampling devices, from dried spots and volumetric absorptive tips to upper-arm liquid capillary collectors, and names what a laboratory must control before their results are used: the haematocrit effect in non-volumetric dried samples, interstitial fluid from finger milking, volume, haemolysis and transport stability. Regulators on both sides of the Atlantic ask for the same two things, a device the patient can use safely and a sample fit for the test.
Ten decentralised cancer trials run across 47 Veterans Affairs medical centres enrolled 134 patients, nearly a third of them rural and a fifth from minority groups, matching the population the VA's tele-oncology service already reaches. The authors' own caveat stands: remote conduct widened access, and not every trial design can be run this way.
Friedman et al., Journal of the National Cancer Institute (paywalled) · source ↗
The Australian Teletrial Programme improved patient access to trials and workforce capability through harmonised processes and training, but broader implementation is limited by workforce turnover, complex approvals, and variable leadership engagement. This highlights that systemic policy and governance support are critical for the sustainable integration of decentralised trial models.
Sabesan et al., Journal of telemedicine and telecare (paywalled) · source ↗
This review suggests that decentralised clinical trials in oncology can improve patient participation and equity but face significant regulatory, logistical and digital hurdles. It concludes that these trials offer a flexible model dependent on specific clinical contexts rather than a universal replacement for conventional methods.
Gentile et al., Critical reviews in oncology/hematology (paywalled) · source ↗
Hybrid decentralized oncology trials are feasible in community hospitals beyond traditional networks, reducing logistical and financial burdens and enabling rapid initiation and patient referrals within three months.