Skip to content
OpenSampling

2022 · Preventive medicine reports · open access

Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a medicaid population

Miller-Wilson et al.

The finding, in our words

A retrospective analysis of laboratory data found that adherence to a home-collected multi-target stool DNA test was 51.3% among Medicaid enrollees, 54.6% in Managed-Medicaid and 38.9% in Fee-For-Service. This shows that navigation-supported stool self-collection is a viable patient-centric option for decentralised screening, though the study was limited by its retrospective design.

A paraphrase to the Library’s standard, never the abstract. The source is one link away and is always the authority.

Labels

  1. 2025

    This study found that stool samples self-collected on cards showed high correlation and agreement with ethanol-fixed samples for metagenomic sequencing, with negligible differences in microbial diversity. The results support the use of stool cards as a cost-effective alternative for decentralised sampling in epidemiologic studies, despite minor variations in individual species abundance.

    Comparing the Metagenomic Performance of Stools Collected from Custom Cards and 95% Ethanol in Epidemiologic StudiesKuntz et al., Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • stool
    • dried
    • self-collection
    • validation
    • microbiome
    • colorectal
  2. 2024

    A pilot RCT found home self-sampling tools substantially increased screening uptake for colorectal cancer, 75% vs 13%, and cervical cancer, 79% vs 8%, versus standard reminders among underserved patients, with abnormal findings in a quarter of returned tests. The study was limited by small sample size and short follow-up.

    Self-sampling tools to increase cancer screening among underserved patients: a pilot randomized controlled trialMoss et al., JNCI cancer spectrum · source ↗

    • stool
    • self-collection
    • colorectal
    • hpv
  3. 2022

    The study demonstrated that a decentralised healthcare model using self-collected blood in stool tests achieved high adherence and early detection rates for colorectal cancer. It also showed a favourable cost-benefit ratio compared to the standard costs of treating advanced disease.

    "CUIDARAS " : A Nominal and Personalized Health Care Model. Effectiveness of a Massive Screening for Colorectal Cancer Detection at Community levelMarin et al., The Gulf journal of oncology (paywalled) · source ↗

    • stool
    • self-collection
    • economics
    • colorectal
  4. 2022

    Non-invasive self-sampling of anal colorectal mucus following defecation provides a patient-acceptable alternative to traditional stool collection for diagnosing colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. This emerging approach allows reliable measurement of diagnostic biomarkers to improve screening compliance.

    Emerging role of colorectal mucus in gastroenterology diagnosticsNooredinvand & Poullis, World journal of gastroenterology · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • colorectal
    • stool
    • biomarkers
  5. 2018

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to raise colorectal cancer screening participation, including mailed outreach of home collection kits.

    Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisDougherty et al., JAMA Internal Medicine (paywalled) · source ↗

    • acceptability
    • self-collection
    • colorectal
    • stool
    • fit